Back to Home

FK Tukums 2000 vs Grobina

2026-09-20 · KO 07:00 · Page generated 2026-11-04

Recent Form

FK Tukums 2000

LDDLW

Grobina

DLLDD

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

FK Tukums 2000

W
1
D
5
L
4
Scored
1.7
Conceded
1.6

Grobina

W
2
D
4
L
4
Scored
0.6
Conceded
1.1

Head to Head

Grobiņa3 - 1FK Tukums 2000
Grobiņa3 - 3FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 20001 - 1Grobiņa
Grobiņa1 - 0FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 20002 - 1Grobiņa

Match Summary

Both teams show similar recent form with 1 wins for FK Tukums 2000 and 0 for Grobina, making this a difficult match to predict confidently. Defensively, FK Tukums 2000 has conceded an average of 1.6 goals per game while Grobina has shipped 1.1, keeping things competitive at both ends. Their head-to-head history shows FK Tukums 2000 winning 6, Grobina winning 2, and 2 draws in their last 10 meetings. FK Tukums 2000 appears better positioned for a positive result.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • FK Tukums 2000 arrive with the better recent results, taking 5 points from 5 compared with 3 for Grobina. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.4 for FK Tukums 2000 and 1.1 for Grobina (2.5 combined). The rates point to a fairly balanced scoring setup. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • Grobina have scored less than once per match on average (0.6), which is the main reason to be cautious about expecting goals from both ends.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • FK Tukums 2000 have taken 2 more points across the listed form sequence (1-2-2 for FK Tukums 2000; 0-3-2 for Grobina). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • FK Tukums 2000 have the better last-ten goal balance (0.1 per match against -0.5 for Grobina), combining scoring and defensive output rather than looking at wins in isolation.
  • FK Tukums 2000 have been the more productive attack in the last-ten sample (1.7 goals per match against 0.6 for Grobina).
  • FK Tukums 2000 (1.6 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.

What challenges the read

  • FK Tukums 2000 score more (1.7 vs 0.6 per match), but also concede more (1.6 vs 1.1). Their attacking edge comes with a defensive trade-off.

What could change it

  • Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

Related Pages

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.