Back to Home

M. Herzliya vs SC Kiryat Yam

2026-09-24 · National League · KO 16:00 · Page generated 2026-11-04

Recent Form

M. Herzliya

LLDWD

SC Kiryat Yam

LLWLW

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

M. Herzliya

W
2
D
2
L
2
Scored
1.2
Conceded
1.2

SC Kiryat Yam

W
3
D
0
L
3
Scored
3.0
Conceded
2.0

Head to Head

Maccabi Herzliya0 - 0Kiryat Yam
Maccabi Herzliya1 - 3Kiryat Yam
Kiryat Yam0 - 0Maccabi Herzliya

Match Summary

Both teams show similar recent form with 1 wins for M. Herzliya and 2 for SC Kiryat Yam, making this a difficult match to predict confidently. Defensively, M. Herzliya has conceded an average of 1.2 goals per game while SC Kiryat Yam has shipped 2, keeping things competitive at both ends. Their head-to-head history shows M. Herzliya winning 0, SC Kiryat Yam winning 1, and 2 draws in their last 3 meetings. SC Kiryat Yam looks better placed to take something from this match.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • SC Kiryat Yam arrive with the better recent results, taking 6 points from 5 compared with 5 for M. Herzliya. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.6 for M. Herzliya and 2.1 for SC Kiryat Yam (3.7 combined). SC Kiryat Yam have the stronger scoring setup on these rates. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • The scoring picture is mixed rather than one-sided: one attack has produced more, but the rates do not point to a clear high- or low-scoring game on their own.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • SC Kiryat Yam have taken 1 more points across the listed form sequence (1-2-2 for M. Herzliya; 2-0-3 for SC Kiryat Yam). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • SC Kiryat Yam have the better last-ten goal balance (1.0 per match against 0.0 for M. Herzliya), combining scoring and defensive output rather than looking at wins in isolation.
  • SC Kiryat Yam have been the more productive attack in the last-ten sample (3.0 goals per match against 1.2 for M. Herzliya).
  • SC Kiryat Yam (2.0 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.

What challenges the read

  • SC Kiryat Yam score more (3.0 vs 1.2 per match), but also concede more (2.0 vs 1.2). Their attacking edge comes with a defensive trade-off.

What could change it

  • Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.