Back to Home

Hap. Ramat Gan vs Maccabi Petah Tikva

2026-10-23 · Various · Page generated 2026-11-04

Recent Form

Hap. Ramat Gan

LWLLW

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

Hap. Ramat Gan

W
2
D
1
L
5
Scored
1.1
Conceded
2.0

Maccabi Petah Tikva

W
3
D
0
L
5
Scored
1.6
Conceded
1.9

Head to Head

Hapoel Ramat Gan1 - 1Maccabi Petach Tikva
Maccabi Petach Tikva2 - 2Hapoel Ramat Gan
Hapoel Ramat Gan0 - 3Maccabi Petach Tikva
Maccabi Petach Tikva1 - 0Hapoel Ramat Gan
Hapoel Ramat Gan0 - 3Maccabi Petach Tikva

Match Summary

Hap. Ramat Gan comes into this match in excellent form with 2 wins from their last 5 matches, recently averaging 1.1 goals scored per game. Defensively, Hap. Ramat Gan has conceded an average of 2 goals per game while Maccabi Petah Tikva has shipped 1.9, keeping things competitive at both ends. Their head-to-head history shows Hap. Ramat Gan winning 2, Maccabi Petah Tikva winning 6, and 2 draws in their last 10 meetings. Expect a competitive match with the potential for a share of the spoils.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • Hap. Ramat Gan arrive with the better recent results, taking 6 points from 5 compared with 0 for Maccabi Petah Tikva. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.5 for Hap. Ramat Gan and 1.8 for Maccabi Petah Tikva (3.3 combined). The rates point to a fairly balanced scoring setup. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • The scoring picture is mixed rather than one-sided: one attack has produced more, but the rates do not point to a clear high- or low-scoring game on their own.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • Hap. Ramat Gan have taken 6 more points across the listed form sequence (2-0-3 for Hap. Ramat Gan; 0-0-5 for Maccabi Petah Tikva). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • Maccabi Petah Tikva have the better last-ten goal balance (-0.3 per match against -0.9 for Hap. Ramat Gan), combining scoring and defensive output rather than looking at wins in isolation.
  • Maccabi Petah Tikva have been the more productive attack in the last-ten sample (1.6 goals per match against 1.1 for Hap. Ramat Gan).
  • Hap. Ramat Gan (2.0 conceded per match) and Maccabi Petah Tikva (1.9 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.

What challenges the read

  • The indicators do not line up neatly: Hap. Ramat Gan lead on recent points, while Maccabi Petah Tikva have the better scoring-minus-conceding balance. That split argues for a measured lean rather than treating either signal as decisive.

What could change it

  • Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.