Back to Home

Yokohama F. Marinos vs Sanfrecce Hiroshima

2026-10-27 · Various · Dataset generated 2026-10-27T17:03:17.879Z · Page generated 2026-11-04

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

Yokohama F. Marinos

W
6
D
2
L
2
Scored
1.6
Conceded
1.0

Sanfrecce Hiroshima

W
7
D
2
L
1
Scored
2.6
Conceded
0.7

Head to Head

Yokohama F.Marinos3 - 0Sanfrecce Hiroshima
Sanfrecce Hiroshima1 - 0Yokohama F.Marinos
Sanfrecce Hiroshima6 - 2Yokohama F.Marinos
Yokohama F.Marinos3 - 2Sanfrecce Hiroshima
Sanfrecce Hiroshima0 - 1Yokohama F.Marinos

Match Summary

Recent form gives Sanfrecce Hiroshima the edge: 4 wins and 1 loss in the last 5, compared with 3 wins and 0 losses for Yokohama F. Marinos. Over the available recent sample, Yokohama F. Marinos average 1.6 goals scored and 1.0 conceded per match; Sanfrecce Hiroshima average 2.6 scored and 0.7 conceded. Sanfrecce Hiroshima hold the stronger profile at both ends: they score more and concede less per match. In the listed head-to-head meetings, Yokohama F. Marinos won 3, Sanfrecce Hiroshima won 2, with 0 draws. Both teams scored in 2 of the 5 meetings, which averaged 3.6 goals overall. Outcome leans: X2 (Sanfrecce Hiroshima or draw) on the stronger recent goal difference; form alone does not make the outright result a strong call. Over 2.5 lean (recent-rate baseline: 3.0 goals). BTTS: no clear lean.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • Sanfrecce Hiroshima arrive with the better recent results, taking 12 points from 5 compared with 11 for Yokohama F. Marinos. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.1 for Yokohama F. Marinos and 1.8 for Sanfrecce Hiroshima (3.0 combined). Sanfrecce Hiroshima have the stronger scoring setup on these rates. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • Both attacks have averaged at least 1.3 goals per match, so neither arrives without recent scoring output. The defensive figures still matter: scoring averages alone are not enough to make a both-teams-to-score call.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • Sanfrecce Hiroshima have taken 1 more points across the listed form sequence (3-2-0 for Yokohama F. Marinos; 4-0-1 for Sanfrecce Hiroshima). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • Sanfrecce Hiroshima have the better last-ten goal balance (1.9 per match against 0.6 for Yokohama F. Marinos), combining scoring and defensive output rather than looking at wins in isolation.
  • Sanfrecce Hiroshima have been the more productive attack in the last-ten sample (2.6 goals per match against 1.6 for Yokohama F. Marinos).

What could change it

  • Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.