2026-10-28 · State Cup · KO 17:30 · Dataset generated 2026-10-28T15:46:06.233Z · Page generated 2026-11-04
Recent Form
MK Kfar Saba 1928
No recent form data available for MK Kfar Saba 1928.
SC Kiryat Yam
Statistics (Last 10 Matches)
MK Kfar Saba 1928
No recent statistics available for MK Kfar Saba 1928.
SC Kiryat Yam
League Table
SC Kiryat Yam
Leumit League
Match Summary
SC Kiryat Yam have 4 wins from the last 5 recorded results; there is not enough comparable form data here to assess the opponent on the same basis. Over the available recent sample, MK Kfar Saba 1928 average 0.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded per match; SC Kiryat Yam average 2.7 scored and 1.6 conceded. The numbers pull in different directions: SC Kiryat Yam have the higher scoring average, while MK Kfar Saba 1928 have been tighter defensively. League context: SC Kiryat Yam are 6 in Leumit League. These positions add season context, but are not directly comparable if the teams are in different competitions. Outcome leans: X2 (SC Kiryat Yam or draw) on the stronger recent goal difference; form alone does not make the outright result a strong call. Over/under 2.5: no clear lean. BTTS: no clear lean.
What to Expect
Matchup outlook
- SC Kiryat Yam have 4 wins in the 5 recent results available. Without a comparable sequence for the opponent, that run cannot establish a form edge in this fixture.
- Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 0.8 for MK Kfar Saba 1928 and 1.4 for SC Kiryat Yam (2.2 combined). SC Kiryat Yam have the stronger scoring setup on these rates. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
- MK Kfar Saba 1928 have scored less than once per match on average (0.0), which is the main reason to be cautious about expecting goals from both ends.
Evidence and Caveats
What supports the read
- SC Kiryat Yam have the better last-ten goal balance (1.1 per match against 0.0 for MK Kfar Saba 1928), combining scoring and defensive output rather than looking at wins in isolation.
- SC Kiryat Yam have been the more productive attack in the last-ten sample (2.7 goals per match against 0.0 for MK Kfar Saba 1928).
- SC Kiryat Yam (1.6 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.
What challenges the read
- SC Kiryat Yam score more (2.7 vs 0.0 per match), but also concede more (1.6 vs 0.0). Their attacking edge comes with a defensive trade-off.
What could change it
- Recent form is available for only one side, so comparisons based on the last few results are incomplete.
- No head-to-head results are listed, so there is no direct series history to add to the comparison.
- These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.
Players to Watch and Team News
No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.
18+ Only
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.
