Back to Home

Nagoya Grampus vs Urawa

2026-10-28 · KO 03:00 · Dataset generated 2026-10-28T15:46:06.233Z · Page generated 2026-11-04

Recent Form

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

Nagoya Grampus

W
3
D
0
L
7
Scored
1.1
Conceded
1.8

Urawa

W
6
D
0
L
4
Scored
2.2
Conceded
2.0

League Table

Nagoya Grampus

J. League

Position
11th
Played
12
Points
14
W-D-L
4-2-6
Goal difference
-4

Urawa

J. League

Position
7th
Played
12
Points
21
W-D-L
7-0-5
Goal difference
-2

Head to Head

Urawa Red Diamonds2 - 1Nagoya Grampus
Nagoya Grampus2 - 1Urawa Red Diamonds
Nagoya Grampus0 - 1Urawa Red Diamonds
Urawa Red Diamonds2 - 1Nagoya Grampus
Urawa Red Diamonds1 - 0Nagoya Grampus

Match Summary

Recent form gives Urawa the edge: 4 wins and 1 loss in the last 5, compared with 1 win and 4 losses for Nagoya Grampus. Over the available recent sample, Nagoya Grampus average 1.1 goals scored and 1.8 conceded per match; Urawa average 2.2 scored and 2.0 conceded. Urawa have scored more, while the defensive averages are close. In the listed head-to-head meetings, Nagoya Grampus won 1, Urawa won 4, with 0 draws. Both teams scored in 3 of the 5 meetings, which averaged 2.2 goals overall. League context: Nagoya Grampus sit 11th and Urawa 7th in J. League. Urawa are higher in the table, and Urawa also have the stronger points-per-game return. That is useful season-long context, while the recent results above show the more immediate form. Outcome leans: X2 (Urawa or draw): form favors Urawa, and the goal difference supports the lean. Over 2.5 lean (recent-rate baseline: 3.6 goals). BTTS: no clear lean.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • Urawa arrive with the better recent results, taking 12 points from 5 compared with 3 for Nagoya Grampus. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.6 for Nagoya Grampus and 2.0 for Urawa (3.5 combined). Urawa have the stronger scoring setup on these rates. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • The scoring picture is mixed rather than one-sided: one attack has produced more, but the rates do not point to a clear high- or low-scoring game on their own.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • Urawa have taken 9 more points across the listed form sequence (1-0-4 for Nagoya Grampus; 4-0-1 for Urawa). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • Urawa have the better last-ten goal balance (0.2 per match against -0.7 for Nagoya Grampus), combining scoring and defensive output rather than looking at wins in isolation.
  • Urawa have been the more productive attack in the last-ten sample (2.2 goals per match against 1.1 for Nagoya Grampus).
  • Nagoya Grampus (1.8 conceded per match) and Urawa (2.0 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.

What could change it

  • Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.