Back to Home

Bodo/Glimt vs Viking

2026-10-30 · KO 13:00 · Dataset generated 2026-10-29T01:03:25.685Z · Page generated 2026-11-04

Recent Form

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

Bodo/Glimt

W
7
D
1
L
2
Scored
2.1
Conceded
1.4

Viking

W
6
D
2
L
2
Scored
2.4
Conceded
0.9

League Table

Bodo/Glimt

Eliteserien

Position
2nd
Played
24
Points
56
W-D-L
18-2-4
Goal difference
+37

Viking

Eliteserien

Position
1st
Played
24
Points
59
W-D-L
19-2-3
Goal difference
+39

Head to Head

Viking5 - 0Bodø/Glimt
Viking2 - 4Bodø/Glimt
Bodø/Glimt2 - 4Viking
Viking1 - 1Bodø/Glimt
Bodø/Glimt1 - 0Viking

Match Summary

Recent form gives Bodo/Glimt the edge: 3 wins and 1 loss in the last 5, compared with 3 wins and 2 losses for Viking. Over the available recent sample, Bodo/Glimt average 2.1 goals scored and 1.4 conceded per match; Viking average 2.4 scored and 0.9 conceded. Viking hold the stronger profile at both ends: they score more and concede less per match. In the listed head-to-head meetings, Bodo/Glimt won 2, Viking won 2, with 1 draw. Both teams scored in 3 of the 5 meetings, which averaged 4.0 goals overall. League context: Bodo/Glimt sit 2nd and Viking 1st in Eliteserien. Viking are higher in the table. That is useful season-long context, while the recent results above show the more immediate form. Outcome leans: X2 (Viking or draw) on the stronger recent goal difference; form alone does not make the outright result a strong call. Over 2.5 lean (recent-rate baseline: 3.4 goals). BTTS: no clear lean.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • Bodo/Glimt arrive with the better recent results, taking 10 points from 5 compared with 9 for Viking. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.5 for Bodo/Glimt and 1.9 for Viking (3.4 combined). The rates point to a fairly balanced scoring setup. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • Both attacks have averaged at least 1.3 goals per match, so neither arrives without recent scoring output. The defensive figures still matter: scoring averages alone are not enough to make a both-teams-to-score call.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • Bodo/Glimt have taken 1 more points across the listed form sequence (3-1-1 for Bodo/Glimt; 3-0-2 for Viking). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • Viking have the better last-ten goal balance (1.5 per match against 0.7 for Bodo/Glimt), combining scoring and defensive output rather than looking at wins in isolation.

What challenges the read

  • The indicators do not line up neatly: Bodo/Glimt lead on recent points, while Viking have the better scoring-minus-conceding balance. That split argues for a measured lean rather than treating either signal as decisive.

What could change it

  • Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.