Back to Home

Mito vs Sanfrecce Hiroshima

2026-10-30 · Various · Dataset generated 2026-10-30T14:01:58.272Z · Page generated 2026-11-04

Recent Form

Mito

WDDLL

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

Mito

W
2
D
4
L
4
Scored
1.1
Conceded
1.3

Sanfrecce Hiroshima

W
7
D
2
L
1
Scored
2.6
Conceded
0.7

League Table

Mito

J. League

Position
17th
Played
12
Points
9
W-D-L
2-3-7
Goal difference
-10

Sanfrecce Hiroshima

J. League

Position
3rd
Played
12
Points
26
W-D-L
8-2-2
Goal difference
+19

Match Summary

Recent form gives Sanfrecce Hiroshima the edge: 4 wins and 1 loss in the last 5, compared with 1 win and 2 losses for Mito. Over the available recent sample, Mito average 1.1 goals scored and 1.3 conceded per match; Sanfrecce Hiroshima average 2.6 scored and 0.7 conceded. Sanfrecce Hiroshima hold the stronger profile at both ends: they score more and concede less per match. League context: Mito sit 17th and Sanfrecce Hiroshima 3rd in J. League. Sanfrecce Hiroshima are higher in the table, and Sanfrecce Hiroshima also have the stronger points-per-game return. That is useful season-long context, while the recent results above show the more immediate form. Outcome leans: X2 (Sanfrecce Hiroshima or draw): form favors Sanfrecce Hiroshima, and the goal difference supports the lean. Over 2.5 lean (recent-rate baseline: 2.9 goals). BTTS: no clear lean.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • Sanfrecce Hiroshima arrive with the better recent results, taking 12 points from 5 compared with 5 for Mito. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 0.9 for Mito and 2.0 for Sanfrecce Hiroshima (2.9 combined). Sanfrecce Hiroshima have the stronger scoring setup on these rates. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • The scoring picture is mixed rather than one-sided: one attack has produced more, but the rates do not point to a clear high- or low-scoring game on their own.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • Sanfrecce Hiroshima have taken 7 more points across the listed form sequence (1-2-2 for Mito; 4-0-1 for Sanfrecce Hiroshima). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • Sanfrecce Hiroshima have the better last-ten goal balance (1.9 per match against -0.2 for Mito), combining scoring and defensive output rather than looking at wins in isolation.
  • Sanfrecce Hiroshima have been the more productive attack in the last-ten sample (2.6 goals per match against 1.1 for Mito).

What could change it

  • No head-to-head results are listed, so there is no direct series history to add to the comparison.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.