Back to Home

RODA JC vs JONG ALKMAAR

2026-10-30 · KO 19:00 · Dataset generated 2026-10-29T01:03:25.685Z · Page generated 2026-11-04

Recent Form

RODA JC

WDWLD

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

RODA JC

W
4
D
4
L
2
Scored
1.0
Conceded
0.8

JONG ALKMAAR

W
4
D
1
L
5
Scored
2.2
Conceded
1.8

League Table

RODA JC

Eerste Divisie

Position
5th
Played
12
Points
22
W-D-L
6-4-2
Goal difference
+4

JONG ALKMAAR

Eerste Divisie

Position
8th
Played
12
Points
17
W-D-L
5-2-5
Goal difference
+5

Head to Head

Jong AZ Alkmaar2 - 0Roda JC Kerkrade
Roda JC Kerkrade2 - 3Jong AZ Alkmaar
Roda JC Kerkrade3 - 3Jong AZ Alkmaar
Jong AZ Alkmaar6 - 1Roda JC Kerkrade
Jong AZ Alkmaar1 - 0Roda JC Kerkrade

Match Summary

Recent form gives RODA JC the edge: 2 wins and 1 loss in the last 5, compared with 2 wins and 2 losses for JONG ALKMAAR. Over the available recent sample, RODA JC average 1.0 goals scored and 0.8 conceded per match; JONG ALKMAAR average 2.2 scored and 1.8 conceded. The numbers pull in different directions: JONG ALKMAAR have the higher scoring average, while RODA JC have been tighter defensively. In the listed head-to-head meetings, RODA JC won 0, JONG ALKMAAR won 4, with 1 draw. Both teams scored in 3 of the 5 meetings, which averaged 4.2 goals overall. League context: RODA JC sit 5th and JONG ALKMAAR 8th in Eerste Divisie. RODA JC are higher in the table, and RODA JC also have the stronger points-per-game return. That is useful season-long context, while the recent results above show the more immediate form. Outcome leans: 1X2: no clear lean from the available form and goal rates. Over 2.5 lean (recent-rate baseline: 2.9 goals). BTTS: no clear lean.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • RODA JC arrive with the better recent results, taking 8 points from 5 compared with 7 for JONG ALKMAAR. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.4 for RODA JC and 1.5 for JONG ALKMAAR (2.9 combined). The rates point to a fairly balanced scoring setup. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • The scoring picture is mixed rather than one-sided: one attack has produced more, but the rates do not point to a clear high- or low-scoring game on their own.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • RODA JC have taken 1 more points across the listed form sequence (2-2-1 for RODA JC; 2-1-2 for JONG ALKMAAR). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • JONG ALKMAAR have been the more productive attack in the last-ten sample (2.2 goals per match against 1.0 for RODA JC).
  • JONG ALKMAAR (1.8 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.

What challenges the read

  • JONG ALKMAAR score more (2.2 vs 1.0 per match), but also concede more (1.8 vs 0.8). Their attacking edge comes with a defensive trade-off.
  • The indicators do not line up neatly: RODA JC lead on recent points, while JONG ALKMAAR have the better scoring-minus-conceding balance. That split argues for a measured lean rather than treating either signal as decisive.

What could change it

  • Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.