Back to Home

Colorado Rapids vs Chicago Fire

2026-10-31 · KO 18:30 · Dataset generated 2026-11-01T15:49:48.870Z · Page generated 2026-11-04

Recent Form

Colorado Rapids

LWWLD

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

Colorado Rapids

W
5
D
1
L
4
Scored
2.2
Conceded
1.5

Chicago Fire

W
6
D
2
L
2
Scored
1.9
Conceded
0.9

Head to Head

Chicago Fire FC4 - 1Colorado Rapids
Colorado Rapids2 - 2Chicago Fire FC
Chicago Fire FC3 - 0Colorado Rapids
Colorado Rapids2 - 1Chicago Fire FC
Chicago Fire FC0 - 1Colorado Rapids

Match Summary

Recent form gives Chicago Fire the edge: 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5, compared with 2 wins and 2 losses for Colorado Rapids. Over the available recent sample, Colorado Rapids average 2.2 goals scored and 1.5 conceded per match; Chicago Fire average 1.9 scored and 0.9 conceded. The numbers pull in different directions: Colorado Rapids have the higher scoring average, while Chicago Fire have been tighter defensively. In the listed head-to-head meetings, Colorado Rapids won 2, Chicago Fire won 2, with 1 draw. Both teams scored in 3 of the 5 meetings, which averaged 3.2 goals overall. Outcome leans: X2 (Chicago Fire or draw): form favors Chicago Fire, and the goal difference supports the lean. Over 2.5 lean (recent-rate baseline: 3.3 goals). BTTS: no clear lean.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • Chicago Fire arrive with the better recent results, taking 13 points from 5 compared with 7 for Colorado Rapids. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.6 for Colorado Rapids and 1.7 for Chicago Fire (3.3 combined). The rates point to a fairly balanced scoring setup. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • Both attacks have averaged at least 1.3 goals per match, so neither arrives without recent scoring output. The defensive figures still matter: scoring averages alone are not enough to make a both-teams-to-score call.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • Chicago Fire have taken 6 more points across the listed form sequence (2-1-2 for Colorado Rapids; 4-1-0 for Chicago Fire). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • Colorado Rapids (1.5 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.

What could change it

  • Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.