Back to Home

FALKENBERG vs SANDVIKEN

2026-10-31 · KO 15:59 · Dataset generated 2026-10-30T06:01:55.647Z · Page generated 2026-11-04

Recent Form

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

FALKENBERG

W
6
D
2
L
2
Scored
1.5
Conceded
1.2

SANDVIKEN

W
2
D
2
L
6
Scored
1.7
Conceded
1.9

League Table

FALKENBERG

Superettan

Position
2nd
Played
28
Points
51
W-D-L
15-6-7
Goal difference
+14

SANDVIKEN

Superettan

Position
8th
Played
28
Points
41
W-D-L
11-8-9
Goal difference
+10

Head to Head

Sandvikens IF4 - 2Falkenbergs FF
Falkenbergs FF4 - 0Sandvikens IF
Sandvikens IF4 - 1Falkenbergs FF

Match Summary

Recent form gives FALKENBERG the edge: 3 wins and 0 losses in the last 5, compared with 0 wins and 3 losses for SANDVIKEN. Over the available recent sample, FALKENBERG average 1.5 goals scored and 1.2 conceded per match; SANDVIKEN average 1.7 scored and 1.9 conceded. FALKENBERG have conceded less, while the scoring averages are close. In the listed head-to-head meetings, FALKENBERG won 1, SANDVIKEN won 2, with 0 draws. Both teams scored in 2 of the 3 meetings, which averaged 5.0 goals overall. League context: FALKENBERG sit 2nd and SANDVIKEN 8th in Superettan. FALKENBERG are higher in the table, and FALKENBERG also have the stronger points-per-game return. That is useful season-long context, while the recent results above show the more immediate form. Outcome leans: 1X (FALKENBERG or draw): form favors FALKENBERG, and the goal difference supports the lean. Over 2.5 lean (recent-rate baseline: 3.1 goals). BTTS yes lean: both teams have scored and conceded regularly in this sample.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • FALKENBERG arrive with the better recent results, taking 11 points from 5 compared with 2 for SANDVIKEN. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.7 for FALKENBERG and 1.4 for SANDVIKEN (3.1 combined). The rates point to a fairly balanced scoring setup. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • Both attacks have averaged at least 1.3 goals per match, so neither arrives without recent scoring output. The defensive figures still matter: scoring averages alone are not enough to make a both-teams-to-score call.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • FALKENBERG have taken 9 more points across the listed form sequence (3-2-0 for FALKENBERG; 0-2-3 for SANDVIKEN). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • FALKENBERG have the better last-ten goal balance (0.3 per match against -0.2 for SANDVIKEN), combining scoring and defensive output rather than looking at wins in isolation.
  • SANDVIKEN (1.9 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.

What could change it

  • Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.