2026-10-31 · KO 17:30 · Dataset generated 2026-10-30T06:01:55.647Z · Page generated 2026-11-04
Recent Form
HAPOEL JERUSALEM
Statistics (Last 10 Matches)
MACCABI NETANYA
HAPOEL JERUSALEM
League Table
HAPOEL JERUSALEM
Ligat ha'Al
Head to Head
Match Summary
Recent form gives MACCABI NETANYA the edge: 2 wins and 2 losses in the last 5, compared with 1 win and 3 losses for HAPOEL JERUSALEM. Over the available recent sample, MACCABI NETANYA average 1.2 goals scored and 0.9 conceded per match; HAPOEL JERUSALEM average 1.7 scored and 2.3 conceded. The numbers pull in different directions: HAPOEL JERUSALEM have the higher scoring average, while MACCABI NETANYA have been tighter defensively. In the listed head-to-head meetings, MACCABI NETANYA won 4, HAPOEL JERUSALEM won 0, with 1 draw. Both teams scored in 4 of the 5 meetings, which averaged 2.8 goals overall. League context: MACCABI NETANYA sit 6th and HAPOEL JERUSALEM 10th in Ligat ha'Al. MACCABI NETANYA are higher in the table, and MACCABI NETANYA also have the stronger points-per-game return. That is useful season-long context, while the recent results above show the more immediate form. Outcome leans: 1X (MACCABI NETANYA or draw): form favors MACCABI NETANYA, and the goal difference supports the lean. Over 2.5 lean (recent-rate baseline: 3.1 goals). BTTS: no clear lean.
What to Expect
Matchup outlook
- MACCABI NETANYA arrive with the better recent results, taking 7 points from 5 compared with 4 for HAPOEL JERUSALEM. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
- Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.8 for MACCABI NETANYA and 1.3 for HAPOEL JERUSALEM (3.0 combined). MACCABI NETANYA have the stronger scoring setup on these rates. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
- The scoring picture is mixed rather than one-sided: one attack has produced more, but the rates do not point to a clear high- or low-scoring game on their own.
Evidence and Caveats
What supports the read
- MACCABI NETANYA have taken 3 more points across the listed form sequence (2-1-2 for MACCABI NETANYA; 1-1-3 for HAPOEL JERUSALEM). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
- MACCABI NETANYA have the better last-ten goal balance (0.3 per match against -0.6 for HAPOEL JERUSALEM), combining scoring and defensive output rather than looking at wins in isolation.
- HAPOEL JERUSALEM have been the more productive attack in the last-ten sample (1.7 goals per match against 1.2 for MACCABI NETANYA).
- HAPOEL JERUSALEM (2.3 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.
What challenges the read
- HAPOEL JERUSALEM score more (1.7 vs 1.2 per match), but also concede more (2.3 vs 0.9). Their attacking edge comes with a defensive trade-off.
What could change it
- Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
- These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.
Players to Watch and Team News
No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.
Related Pages
18+ Only
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.
