Win2026-10-31 · Various · Dataset generated 2026-10-31T02:26:03.629Z · Page generated 2026-11-04
Recent Form
Varberg
Statistics (Last 10 Matches)
Varberg
Ljungskile
League Table
Varberg
Superettan
Head to Head
Match Summary
Recent form gives Ljungskile the edge: 3 wins and 2 losses in the last 5, compared with 2 wins and 1 loss for Varberg. Over the available recent sample, Varberg average 1.5 goals scored and 1.6 conceded per match; Ljungskile average 1.6 scored and 1.1 conceded. Ljungskile have conceded less, while the scoring averages are close. In the listed head-to-head meetings, Varberg won 4, Ljungskile won 0, with 1 draw. Both teams scored in 3 of the 5 meetings, which averaged 2.8 goals overall. League context: Varberg sit 4th and Ljungskile 12th in Superettan. Varberg are higher in the table, and Varberg also have the stronger points-per-game return. That is useful season-long context, while the recent results above show the more immediate form. Outcome leans: 1X2: no clear lean from the available form and goal rates. Over 2.5 lean (recent-rate baseline: 2.9 goals). BTTS yes lean: both teams have scored and conceded regularly in this sample.
What to Expect
Matchup outlook
- Ljungskile arrive with the better recent results, taking 9 points from 5 compared with 8 for Varberg. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
- Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.3 for Varberg and 1.6 for Ljungskile (2.9 combined). The rates point to a fairly balanced scoring setup. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
- Both attacks have averaged at least 1.3 goals per match, so neither arrives without recent scoring output. The defensive figures still matter: scoring averages alone are not enough to make a both-teams-to-score call.
Evidence and Caveats
What supports the read
- Ljungskile have taken 1 more points across the listed form sequence (2-2-1 for Varberg; 3-0-2 for Ljungskile). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
- Ljungskile have the better last-ten goal balance (0.5 per match against -0.1 for Varberg), combining scoring and defensive output rather than looking at wins in isolation.
- Varberg (1.6 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.
What could change it
- Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
- These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.
Players to Watch and Team News
No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.
18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure
Related Pages
18+ Only
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.