Back to Home

BFC Daugavpils vs FK Tukums 2000

2026-11-01 · KO 04:00 · Dataset generated 2026-10-31T15:04:10.068Z · Page generated 2026-11-04

Recent Form

FK Tukums 2000

DDLDD

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

BFC Daugavpils

W
4
D
1
L
5
Scored
1.4
Conceded
1.8

FK Tukums 2000

W
1
D
6
L
3
Scored
1.3
Conceded
1.5

League Table

BFC Daugavpils

Virsliga

Position
4th
Played
34
Points
48
W-D-L
13-9-12
Goal difference
+3

FK Tukums 2000

Virsliga

Position
9th
Played
34
Points
25
W-D-L
5-10-19
Goal difference
-21

Head to Head

BFC Daugavpils2 - 0FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 20001 - 1BFC Daugavpils
FK Tukums 20001 - 1BFC Daugavpils
FK Tukums 20000 - 1BFC Daugavpils
BFC Daugavpils1 - 2FK Tukums 2000

Match Summary

Recent form gives BFC Daugavpils the edge: 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5, compared with 0 wins and 1 loss for FK Tukums 2000. Over the available recent sample, BFC Daugavpils average 1.4 goals scored and 1.8 conceded per match; FK Tukums 2000 average 1.3 scored and 1.5 conceded. FK Tukums 2000 have conceded less, while the scoring averages are close. In the listed head-to-head meetings, BFC Daugavpils won 2, FK Tukums 2000 won 1, with 2 draws. Both teams scored in 3 of the 5 meetings, which averaged 2.0 goals overall. League context: BFC Daugavpils sit 4th and FK Tukums 2000 9th in Virsliga. BFC Daugavpils are higher in the table, and BFC Daugavpils also have the stronger points-per-game return. That is useful season-long context, while the recent results above show the more immediate form. Outcome leans: 1X (BFC Daugavpils or draw): form favors BFC Daugavpils, but the goal rates make the outright win less secure. Over 2.5 lean (recent-rate baseline: 3.0 goals). BTTS yes lean: both teams have scored and conceded regularly in this sample.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • BFC Daugavpils arrive with the better recent results, taking 13 points from 5 compared with 4 for FK Tukums 2000. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.4 for BFC Daugavpils and 1.6 for FK Tukums 2000 (3.0 combined). The rates point to a fairly balanced scoring setup. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • Both attacks have averaged at least 1.3 goals per match, so neither arrives without recent scoring output. The defensive figures still matter: scoring averages alone are not enough to make a both-teams-to-score call.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • BFC Daugavpils have taken 9 more points across the listed form sequence (4-1-0 for BFC Daugavpils; 0-4-1 for FK Tukums 2000). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • BFC Daugavpils (1.8 conceded per match) and FK Tukums 2000 (1.5 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.

What challenges the read

  • The indicators do not line up neatly: BFC Daugavpils lead on recent points, while FK Tukums 2000 have the better scoring-minus-conceding balance. That split argues for a measured lean rather than treating either signal as decisive.

What could change it

  • Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.