Back to Home

KWARA vs BENDEL INSURANCE

2026-11-01 · KO 15:00 · Dataset generated 2026-10-31T02:26:03.629Z · Page generated 2026-11-04

Recent Form

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

KWARA

W
3
D
3
L
4
Scored
1.1
Conceded
1.1

BENDEL INSURANCE

W
5
D
0
L
4
Scored
1.8
Conceded
1.6

League Table

KWARA

Professional Football League

Position
13th
Played
10
Points
12
W-D-L
3-3-4
Goal difference
0

BENDEL INSURANCE

Professional Football League

Position
7th
Played
9
Points
15
W-D-L
5-0-4
Goal difference
+2

Head to Head

Kwara United0 - 1Bendel Insurance
Bendel Insurance2 - 0Kwara United
Kwara United0 - 1Bendel Insurance
Bendel Insurance3 - 1Kwara United
Kwara United1 - 1Bendel Insurance

Match Summary

Recent form gives BENDEL INSURANCE the edge: 3 wins and 2 losses in the last 5, compared with 1 win and 2 losses for KWARA. Over the available recent sample, KWARA average 1.1 goals scored and 1.1 conceded per match; BENDEL INSURANCE average 1.8 scored and 1.6 conceded. The numbers pull in different directions: BENDEL INSURANCE have the higher scoring average, while KWARA have been tighter defensively. In the listed head-to-head meetings, KWARA won 0, BENDEL INSURANCE won 4, with 1 draw. Both teams scored in 2 of the 5 meetings, which averaged 2.0 goals overall. League context: KWARA sit 13th and BENDEL INSURANCE 7th in Professional Football League. BENDEL INSURANCE are higher in the table, and BENDEL INSURANCE also have the stronger points-per-game return. That is useful season-long context, while the recent results above show the more immediate form. Outcome leans: X2 (BENDEL INSURANCE or draw): form favors BENDEL INSURANCE, and the goal difference supports the lean. Over 2.5 lean (recent-rate baseline: 2.8 goals). BTTS: no clear lean.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • BENDEL INSURANCE arrive with the better recent results, taking 9 points from 5 compared with 5 for KWARA. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.4 for KWARA and 1.5 for BENDEL INSURANCE (2.8 combined). The rates point to a fairly balanced scoring setup. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • The scoring picture is mixed rather than one-sided: one attack has produced more, but the rates do not point to a clear high- or low-scoring game on their own.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • BENDEL INSURANCE have taken 4 more points across the listed form sequence (1-2-2 for KWARA; 3-0-2 for BENDEL INSURANCE). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • BENDEL INSURANCE have been the more productive attack in the last-ten sample (1.8 goals per match against 1.1 for KWARA).
  • BENDEL INSURANCE (1.6 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.

What challenges the read

  • BENDEL INSURANCE score more (1.8 vs 1.1 per match), but also concede more (1.6 vs 1.1). Their attacking edge comes with a defensive trade-off.

What could change it

  • Head-to-head results are useful context, but the list does not show when those matches were played; older meetings may say little about the current squads.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.