Back to Home

H. Raanana vs SC Kiryat Yam

2026-11-02 · National League · KO 17:00 · Dataset generated 2026-11-02T05:16:33.965Z · Page generated 2026-11-04

Recent Form

H. Raanana

LWLLD

SC Kiryat Yam

WWWDW

Statistics (Last 10 Matches)

H. Raanana

W
5
D
1
L
4
Scored
2.1
Conceded
1.4

SC Kiryat Yam

W
6
D
1
L
3
Scored
2.7
Conceded
1.6

League Table

H. Raanana

Leumit League

Position
6th
Played
11
Points
19
W-D-L
6-1-4
Goal difference
+8

SC Kiryat Yam

Leumit League

Position
7th
Played
11
Points
19
W-D-L
6-1-4
Goal difference
+7

Head to Head

Hapoel Raanana0 - 2Kiryat Yam
Kiryat Yam4 - 0Hapoel Raanana

Match Summary

Recent form gives SC Kiryat Yam the edge: 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5, compared with 1 win and 3 losses for H. Raanana. Over the available recent sample, H. Raanana average 2.1 goals scored and 1.4 conceded per match; SC Kiryat Yam average 2.7 scored and 1.6 conceded. SC Kiryat Yam have scored more, while the defensive averages are close. League context: H. Raanana sit 6th and SC Kiryat Yam 7th in Leumit League. H. Raanana are higher in the table. That is useful season-long context, while the recent results above show the more immediate form. Outcome leans: X2 (SC Kiryat Yam or draw): form favors SC Kiryat Yam, and the goal difference supports the lean. Over 2.5 lean (recent-rate baseline: 3.9 goals). BTTS yes lean: both teams have scored and conceded regularly in this sample.

What to Expect

Matchup outlook

  • SC Kiryat Yam arrive with the better recent results, taking 13 points from 5 compared with 4 for H. Raanana. That is a form advantage, not by itself a reason to expect a comfortable win.
  • Using each side’s last-ten-match scoring and conceding averages, a cross-check against the opponent’s defense gives a descriptive baseline of about 1.9 for H. Raanana and 2.0 for SC Kiryat Yam (3.9 combined). The rates point to a fairly balanced scoring setup. This is a comparison of past averages, not a score forecast.
  • Both attacks have averaged at least 1.3 goals per match, so neither arrives without recent scoring output. The defensive figures still matter: scoring averages alone are not enough to make a both-teams-to-score call.

Evidence and Caveats

What supports the read

  • SC Kiryat Yam have taken 9 more points across the listed form sequence (1-1-3 for H. Raanana; 4-1-0 for SC Kiryat Yam). The gap is more informative than wins alone because it also accounts for draws.
  • SC Kiryat Yam have the better last-ten goal balance (1.1 per match against 0.7 for H. Raanana), combining scoring and defensive output rather than looking at wins in isolation.
  • SC Kiryat Yam have been the more productive attack in the last-ten sample (2.7 goals per match against 2.1 for H. Raanana).
  • SC Kiryat Yam (1.6 conceded per match) have allowed at least 1.5 goals per match. That is a defensive weakness in the sample, though it does not show how those goals were created or whether the same pattern will carry into this fixture.

What could change it

  • Only 2 head-to-head results are listed. That is too small a sample to outweigh the current team data.
  • These are team-level averages, not a tactical or lineup report. They do not account for opponent strength, confirmed starters, injuries, venue conditions, or how each team performed home and away.

Players to Watch and Team News

No current player scoring data is available for this exact fixture and date. Injury and suspension status is not verified, so no absence claims are made.

18+ | T&Cs apply | Gamble responsibly | Includes affiliate commission disclosure

18+ Only

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Gambling involves financial risk and may lead to addiction. Please play responsibly.